
Central Europe Review
7 May, 2001
Privatisation for Whom?
The Czech state, citizens or foreign investors
by Mark Preskett
Emerging from "splendid isolation"
The collapse of Communism brought an end to Czechoslovakia's "splendid
isolation." In 1989, the country emerged with little foreign debt and
few foreign-owned companies. Unlike Poland and Hungary, which began introducing
economic reforms under Communism, Czechoslovakia maintained a strict command
economy throughout the 1980s.
After 1993, the Czech Republic followed post-Communist Czechoslovakia's
lead in pursuing liberal economic reforms. According to Josef Poschl of
The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (WIIW), "Uniquely
in Central Europe, Czech companies were advanced enough to stand a chance
of surviving in a market economy."
The Czech Republic remained among the most industrialised countries in
Central Europe-a legacy leftover from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, as
well as the early years of Czechoslovak independence. The country has
continued to benefit economically from both its geographical location
and educated workforce.
These factors have made the Czech Republic a prime investment site for
Western companies. Despite these advantages, however, by the mid-1990s,
the economy was shrinking instead of growing and even the Czech National
Bank publicly voiced doubts concerning the country's economic future.
The scheme that failed
What went wrong? Much of the blame for the Czech Republic's economic
decline lies with the country's privatisation voucher scheme. Intended
as a quick way of transferring state-owned firms to private hands, each
citizen of the Czech Republic paid CZK 1000 for a coupon book, which was
to be exchanged for company shares. Though millions of Czechs became instant
shareholders, the scheme failed to bring in intended amounts of investment.
A second problem was that much of the privatisation was illusory. The
state maintained majority or controlling shares in the country's largest
banks. The banks in turn set up investment funds, which purchased the
citizens' coupon books. By concentrating the funds from those purchases,
the banks ended up controlling much of the economy, including the industrial
giants.
Finally, the first wave of the privatisation scheme limited investment
by excluding the sale of property and businesses to foreigners. This dearth
of foreign investment continued until recently.
Czech provincialism
Why the reluctance to sell to foreigners? The heart of the matter is
that many Czechs see foreign companies as exploitative, rather than operating
in the best interest of the Czech Republic. A classic example is the case
of the IPB/Nomura affair.
The Japanese investment firm, Nomura, took control of IPB, then the fourth
largest bank in the Czech Republic, in 1993. From the beginning, Nomura
did not act like a strategic investor and was instead accused of asset
stripping. The purchase of the Czech breweries PlzenskÃÅ Prazdroj and
Radegast, financed by IPB assets, is still being disputed today. When
Nomura sold the two breweries to South African Breweries (SAB), IPB saw
none of the money.
Despite the decline in popularity for the ruling Social Democrats (ÄÆSSD)
(polls show that only 15 per cent of Czechs intend to support the party
in next year's general election), ÄÆSSD has helped drag the economy from
the mire and in doing so has realised the importance of attracting foreign
capital.
Prime Minister Miloš Zeman has spent much time abroad, as well as at
home, attempting to persuade foreign businesses that the Czech Republic
is a safe place to invest. In 1998, the government introduced the Foreigner
Investment Scheme indicating its willingness to forfeit the state's controlling
shares over hundreds of industries.
Foreign direct investment (FDI) figures show that the majority of foreign
capital invested in the Czech Republic in recent years has been concentrated
in the areas of telecommunications and banking. Despite a few high-profile
investments, however, FDI figures remain low. There are a number of individual
cases that show that Czechs remain reluctant to sell to foreigners-what
President Vacláv Havel has called "Czech Provincialism."
For example, when in 1999 the Swedish construction giant, Skanska, first
attempted to buy a controlling stake in IPS, the Czech Republic's biggest
builder, it was given a polite but firm "no." Most of IPS's shares at
the time were held by the investment funds of three Czech banks. These
funds were forced to sell their shares in order to meet the government's
new privatisation requirements. StÅôedoevropské stavebnÃ, a year-old
subsidiary of the Sekyra Group, a real-estate firm, won the right to purchase
the shares. The reasons? Sekyra's bid was CZK three per share higher than
Skanska's, totalling CZK 2.1 billion. In addition, Sekyra was a Czech
firm.
"IPS is in Czech hands," boasted the headline in Construction Journal,
a Prague trade magazine. The group's chairman, Ludek Sekyra, told the
magazine that "IPS is a strategic firm that can grow just as well under
Czech control."
Unfortunately, holes began to appear in the Sekyra bid when it came time
for money to change hands. Despite Sekyra's claim to be in possession
of a nine-year bank loan and supported by minority partners, the CZK 1.5
billion loan was in fact just a 30-day note and the minority partners
never materialised. In addition, 70 per cent of the financial backing
came from InvestiÄænà a PoÅ¡tovnà banka (IPB), a bank which was later
placed under forced administration by the state in May 2000. When ÄÆeskoslovenska
obchodnà banka (ÄÆSOB), a second Czech bank bought IPB, it quickly sold
the controlling stake in IPS to Skanska. Skanska was ultimately rewarded
for its patience.
Parking, payment and promises
A second example of Czech reluctance to sell to foreigners can be seen
in the case of the American parking firm, Central Parking System (CPS).
In 1997, a public tender was held for the lease of the parking garage
complex at Prague's main railway station. Lukas, a Czech firm, won the
tender. CPS placed second.
Two years later, the Prague City Council cancelled the contract with
Lukas as a result of non-payment of rent. The tender was then offered
to CPS-a decision that was later challenged by another Czech firm, Eltodo.
As a result, the Council decided to announce a new selection process.
The executive board of Eltodo, CPS's new rival for the contract, included
the former Mayor of Prague, Jan Koukal, his assistant, Martin Vlk and
Petr Zajicek, former chairman of the controlling commission for the City
Council. Both Eltodo and CPS submitted their tenders for consideration.
The following day, copies of both tenders were leaked to the Czech daily
Mlada fronta Dnes.
According to MF Dnes, 80 per cent of Eltodo's tender was identical
to the tender put forward by CPS in the original selection process in
1997. The newspaper printed a section of the two tenders whereby Eltodo
had forgotten to change the initials CPS to Eltodo.
When MF Dnes approached Filip Dvorak, the spokesman for Eltodo,
for a reaction he stated "We have never seen CPS's business plan because
they are our competition. We know nothing of this firm, we know only that
some foreigners work for them." It came as little surprise when Eltodo
was offered the contract at the beginning of last year.
"Every meeting with the City Council came down to one thing," said Chris
Guilds, CPS's General Manager for the Czech Republic. "They would not
believe that we were serious about the Czech Republic and would hold to
our investment promises."
Foreign firms and local support
While examples, such as the IPB/Nomura case, support
Czech fears concerning foreign investment, conversely, there is much to
be gained from cooperation with foreign firms. For example, foreign firms
can offer local firms contacts abroad, as well as access to new markets;
skills and experience that differ from locally owned firms. Most importantly,
foreign firms can contribute much needed capital. Unfortunately, with
more and more foreign firms entering the market, many local businesses
will go bankrupt-the main cost of modernising the economy. However,
as the Polish management consultant Ron Nawrocki said, "Transition is
painful."
In the immediate future, FDI figures are likely to increase as the state
plans to sell some large industry leaders. These companies include: the
telecommunications firm, ÄÆeskÃÅ radiokomunikacÃ, the largest bank, Komeræny
banka and the power utility giant, ÄÆEZ.
Two important issues will affect future levels of foreign investment
in the Czech Republic. Next year's general election is expected to influence
foreign investment, whether or not the new government will continue selling
off companies that remain in state hands. Second, the question remains
as to whether the Czech people are willing to cast aside negative views
of foreigners and welcome the investment that they can bring.
Back to List of Articles
|